General
Yancy v. California et al.
375 U.S. 869·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1,
Misc.
Yancy v. California et al.
Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer and Don G. Kircher, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.