Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Holland, Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Lowell Sun Co., 1942 — 315 U.S. 784 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Holland, Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Lowell Sun Co.
315 U.S. 78486 L. Ed. 1190·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 529.
Holland, Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor, v. Lowell Sun Co.
Argued February 4, 5, 1942.
Decided March 2, 1942.
Mr, Warner W. Gardner, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Richard S. Salant, Irving J. Levy, and Jacob D. Hyman were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Elisha Hanson, with whom Mr. Frank Goldman was on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Victor W. Klein filed a brief, as amicus curiae, in support of respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.