Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas L. Parker, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Martin W. Brett et al., Appellants, 1872 — 50 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas L. Parker, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Martin W. Brett et al., Appellants
50 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas L. Parker, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Martin W. Brett et al., Appellants.
(Argued November 14, 1872;
decided November 19, 1872.)
Decided upon the evidence, and upon questions as to the reception and rejection of evidence.
WilUam G. Goohe for the appellants.
E. G. Benedict for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Peckham, J.,]
Peckham, J.,
reads opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.