Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
A-C INVESTMENT ASSOCIATION, Unincorporated, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 1933 — 68 F.2d 390 · caselaw · US
Tax
A-C INVESTMENT ASSOCIATION, Unincorporated, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
68 F.2d 390·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
A-C INVESTMENT ASSOCIATION, Unincorporated, Petitioner, v. Guy T. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
No. 5857.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued Oct. 12, 1933.
Decided Nov. 13, 1933.
R. C. Eulbright and John C. White, both of Washington, I). C., for petitioner.
Q-. A. Youngquist, Sewall Key, Carlton Eox, C. M. Charest, Walter L. Barlow, and Shelby S. Faulkner, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, IIITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — GRONER, Associate Justice.]
GRONER, Associate Justice.
The facts and law on which this case turns are identical in all respects with the facts and law of No. 5856 (A-C Investment Association v. Commissioner, 62 App. D. C. -, 68 F.(2d) 386), except that the tax year in question is 1928. The reasons applying for the reversal in No-. 5856 apply equally here, and the decision in this ease is therefore reversed.
Reversed.