Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna Seitz, Appellant, v. Magdalena Messerschmitt, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Anna Seitz, Appellant, v. Magdalena Messerschmitt, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
188 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna Seitz, Appellant, v. Magdalena Messerschmitt, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
(Submitted April 2, 1907;
decided April 16, 1907.)
Seitz v. Messerschmitt, 117 App. Div. 401, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Rebruary 8, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting the motion of the respondent herein to be relieved of her purchase of real property at a partition sale.
John F. Frees and George Q. Oollins for appellant.
Joseph T. Weed for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscook and Chase, J.J.