Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick C. Clark et al., Appellants, v. William O. Schwarzwaelder et al., Respondents, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick C. Clark et al., Appellants, v. William O. Schwarzwaelder et al., Respondents
167 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick C. Clark et al., Appellants, v. William O. Schwarzwaelder et al., Respondents.
(Argued May 7, 1901;
decided May 24, 1901.)
Clark v. Schwarzwaelder, 46 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 19, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and granting a new trial.
D. M. Porter for appellants.
Almet R. Latson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Bartlett and Vann, JJ.