Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Tawes, 1940 — 311 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
General
Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Tawes
311 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 329.
Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. Tawes.
October 14, 1940.
Messrs. Jos. M. Rault and Benjamin W. Yancey for. petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attor ney General' Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Wm. A. Van Siclen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to ..the Circuit Court, of Appeals for the .Fifth Circuit denied,