General
In re JEROME LYMAN RICHARDSON, on Disbarment
20 Cal. 2d 894·Supreme Court of California·1942·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 4277.
In Bank.
Mar. 19, 1942.]
In re JEROME LYMAN RICHARDSON, on Disbarment.
[Prior opinion (15 Cal. (2d) 536).]
Miguel Estadillo, Robert W. Kenny and Morris E. Cohn for Petitioner.
Philbrick McCoy for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
— It appearing upon investigation and report by The State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.