Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., Trustee, 1954 — 348 U.S. 856 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., Trustee
348 U.S. 856·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 289.
Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al. v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., Trustee.
Charles M. McCarty for the Prudence-Bonds Corporation, Geo. C. Wildermuth for Castellano, Samuel Silbiger for Eddy, and Aaron Schwartz for Samson et al., petitioners.
John A. Wilson and Willard M. L. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.