Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
James M. Held et al., Plaintiffs, v. The Pike Company et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. CME Associates, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
117 A.D.3d 1500984 N.Y.S.2d 903·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2014·NY
Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James M. Held et al., Plaintiffs, v The Pike Company et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. CME Associates, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
[984 NYS2d 903]
[MAJORITY]
— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered January 14, 2013. The order, among other things, denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the amended third-party complaint.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.