General
McKay, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Clackamas County, Oregon
349 U.S. 909·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 604.
McKay, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Clackamas County, Oregon.
Solicitor General Sobeloff for petitioners.
A. W. Lafferty and Richard L. Merrick for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot.
Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent.