Tax
OAK WORSTED MILLS v. Blakely D. McCAUGHN, Collector of Internal Revenue
6 F.2d 662·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OAK WORSTED MILLS v. Blakely D. McCAUGHN, Collector of Internal Revenue.
(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
July 8, 1925.)
No. 3379.
In Equity.
Kirchner, Mitchell & White, of Philadelphia, Pa., George W. Aubrey, of Allentown, Pa., and Frederick G. Fischer, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. ,
George W. Coles, U. S. Atty., and Joseph L. Kun, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.
[MAJORITY — THOMPSON, District Judge.]
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The corn trolling facts in this ease are substantially identical with those in the case of Emaus Silk Co. v. McCaughn (D. C.) 6 F.(2d) 660, in which an opinion was filed this day.
Eor the reasons stated in that opinion, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction herein is denied, and a decree may be entered dismissing the bill.