Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al., 1963 — 375 U.S. 950 · caselaw · US
General
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al.
375 U.S. 950·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 14,
Original.
Louisiana v. Mississippi et al.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, Carroll Buck, First Assistant Attorney General, and Edward M. Carmouche and John L. Madden, Assistant Attorneys General, for plaintiff. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, Martin R. McLendon and James Neville Patterson, Assistant Attorneys General, and Landman Teller, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for Mississippi et al., and Robert M. Bass, Jr., M. M. Roberts and E. L. Brunini for Humble Oil & Refining Co., defendants.
Argued December 10, 1963.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is granted and the State of Mississippi is allowed 90 days to answer.
[For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 803.]