Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. L. Croan et al., 1916 — 242 U.S. 610 · caselaw · US
General
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. L. Croan et al.
242 U.S. 610·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 453.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. L. Croan et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Submitted pursuant to 20th rule October 12, 19Í6.
Decided October 23, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Northern Pacific Railway v. Wall, 241 U. S. 87; Cincinnati & Pacific Railway v. Rankin, 241 U. S. 319. Mr. Chas. H. Moorman and Mr. Benjamin D. Warfield for the plaintiff in error. Mr. William W. Crawford for the defendants in error.