Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginia S. Sands, as Administratrix of James G. Sands, Deceased, Respondent, v. Henry C. Miner, Appellant, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
Virginia S. Sands, as Administratrix of James G. Sands, Deceased, Respondent, v. Henry C. Miner, Appellant
160 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virginia S. Sands, as Administratrix of James G. Sands, Deceased, Respondent, v. Henry C. Miner, Appellant.
(Argued October 5, 1899;
decided October 24, 1899.)
Sands v. Miner, 16 App. Div. 347, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 26, 1897, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Nathaniel Cohen and Howe & Hummel for appellant.
Frank Barker for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below5.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., and Bartlett, J., not sitting.