William Kobryn v. Gladys W. Kobryn

William Kobryn v. Gladys W. Kobryn Eing, O. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js. Argued June 7 decided June 25, 1968 Julius Watstein, with whom was Herbert Watstein, for the appellant (plaintiff). H. Gibson Guión, with whom, on the brief, was Hadley W. Austin, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The finding is not subject to correction in any respect which will assist the plaintiff. Any correction to which the plaintiff is entitled would not change the result in any way. Taylor v. Taylor, 154 Conn. 340, 341, 225 A.2d 196; Sipp v. Sipp, 151 Conn. 705, 197 A.2d 73. The assignment of error on the evidential ruling was not briefed and must therefore be considered abandoned. Bartlett v. Flaherty, 155 Conn. 203, 204, 230 A.2d 436; Shelton Yacht & Cabana Club, Inc. v. Suto, 150 Conn. 251, 254, 188 A.2d 493; Hannifan v. Sachs, 150 Conn. 162, 165, 187 A.2d 253. The conclusions which the court reached find ample support in the subordinate facts. There is no error.