Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Security Industrial Bank et al., 1981 — 454 U.S. 1122 · caselaw · US
Securities
United States v. Security Industrial Bank et al.
454 U.S. 1122·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-184.
United States v. Security Industrial Bank et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc., to consolidate this case with No. 81-150, Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. et al. [probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 1029]; No. 81-546, United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. et al. [probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 1029]; and No. 81-583, Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. v. United States et al., denied. Probable jurisdiction noted.