Contracts · MBE-tested
Henry A. Siebrecht, Respondent, v. New York, Westchester and Boston Railway Company and The City and County Contract Company, Appellants
173 A.D. 950·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1916·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry A. Siebrecht, Respondent, v. New York, Westchester and Boston Railway Company and The City and County Contract Company, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
—Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of Goodenough v. New York, Westchester & Boston R. Co., decided herewith (ante, p. 948). fenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Mills, J., dissented upon the sole ground that the construction and operation of a railroad for public use are not within the prohibition of the restrictions.