Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of GLUCKSMAN BROS. & LIFSCHULTZ, a New York Corporation, to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan in the Case of Earl G. MINSTER, Bankrupt, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Petition of GLUCKSMAN BROS. & LIFSCHULTZ, a New York Corporation, to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan in the Case of Earl G. MINSTER, Bankrupt
22 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of GLUCKSMAN BROS. & LIFSCHULTZ, a New York Corporation, to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan in the Case of Earl G. MINSTER, Bankrupt.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 6, 1927.
No. 5025.
Petition to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Clarence W. Simons, Judge.
Max Kahn, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.
James A. Muir, of Port Huron, Mich., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to motion of counsel for respondent.