Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona v. California et al., 1982 — 456 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
456 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Justice Marshall and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,
Orig.
Arizona v. California et al.
[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 444 U. S. 1009.]
[MAJORITY]
Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. Exceptions, if any, with supporting briefs to the Report may be filed by the parties within 45 days. Reply briefs, if any, to such Exceptions may be filed within 30 days.
Justice Marshall and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.