Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. et al. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al.; and Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al. v. Austin Theatre, Inc. et al., 1956 — 350 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. et al. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al.; and Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al. v. Austin Theatre, Inc. et al.
350 U.S. 932·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 456.
No. 512.
Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. et al. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al.; and Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al. v. Austin Theatre, Inc. et al.
Bruno Schachner and Arnold Malkan for petitioners in No. 456. Bruce Bromley for Paramount Film Distributing Corporation et al., George A. Raftery for RKO Keith-Orpheum Theatres, Inc. et al., and Myles J. Lane for Stanley Warner Management Corporation et al., petitioners in No. 512 and respondents in No. 456.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 224 F. 2d 824.