Corporations
Emil Senholzi and Lilla Senholzi, Respondents, v. Max Popper, Individually and as President of Fairfield Development Corporation, Fairfield Development Corporation, Appellants, and " Nathan " J. Shatzkin, etc., Defendant
227 A.D. 606·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emil Senholzi and Lilla Senholzi, Respondents, v. Max Popper, Individually and as President of Fairfield Development Corporation, Fairfield Development Corporation, Appellants, and “ Nathan ” J. Shatzkin, etc., Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the October term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.; Scudder, J., absent.