General
Cleveland LAVENDER v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA
29 Ala. App. 508198 So. 461·Alabama Court of Appeals·1940·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
198 So. 461
Cleveland LAVENDER v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA.
6 Div. 589.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Aug. 6, 1940.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1940.
Jas. J. Mayfield, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant.
E. W. Skidmore, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.]
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
From an examination of the record,, briefs of counsel, etc., in this case we find it in every respect identical with the case of Cleveland Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa, 198 So. 459, which case having been-, considered and determined by this court, present term, and a judgment of affirmance ordered, we need not write further in the-case at bar; except to order and adjudge-that the judgment of the lower court, from, which this appeal was taken, be affirmed, upon authority of the case of Cleveland. Lavender v. City of Tuscaloosa, supra.
Affirmed.
Ante, p. 502.