Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of FOX WEST COAST THEATRES, a Corporation, Bankrupt. Charles P. SKOURAS, et al., Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA DENTAL SUPPLY CO., Appellee, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1004 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of FOX WEST COAST THEATRES, a Corporation, Bankrupt. Charles P. SKOURAS, et al., Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA DENTAL SUPPLY CO., Appellee
69 F.2d 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of FOX WEST COAST THEA-TRES, a Corporation, Bankrupt. Charles P. SKOURAS, et al., Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA DENTAL SUPPLY CO., Appellee.
No. 7399.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 1934.
Grainger & Hunt and O’Melveny, Tuller & Myers, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Jennings & Belcher, of Los Angeles', Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRE CHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith, without costs to either party.