General
James Hartley, Respondent, v. Pioneer Iron Works, Appellant
189 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Hartley, Respondent, v. Pioneer Iron Works, Appellant.
Hartley v. Pioneer Iron Works, 113 App. Div. 919, affirmed.
(Submitted June 6, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 22, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action by a stockholder to recover certain dividends alleged to be due and unpaid.
Albert G. McDonald for appellant.
William N DyTcman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion on former appeal. (181 N. Y. 73.)
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Abs'ent: Haight, J.