Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Russell Johnson et al., Composing the Firm of Johnson Brothers, Appellants, v. Walter D. Haws, Respondent, Impleaded with Another. Same, Appellants, v. Same, Respondent, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
Russell Johnson et al., Composing the Firm of Johnson Brothers, Appellants, v. Walter D. Haws, Respondent, Impleaded with Another. Same, Appellants, v. Same, Respondent
168 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Russell Johnson et al., Composing the Firm of Johnson Brothers, Appellants, v. Walter D. Haws, Respondent, Impleaded with Another. Same, Appellants, v. Same, Respondent.
Johnson v. Haws, 47 App. Div. 597, affirmed.
(Argued October 14, 1901;
decided November 1, 1901.)
Appeals from two judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 20, 1900, affirming two judgments in favor of defendant entered upon dismissals of the complaints by the court on trial at Special Term.
Carlisle Norwood for appellants.
Vernon If. Drnis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett,'Martin, Vann,' Cullen and Werner, JJ.