General
In the Matter of the Application of Lindwood J. Putnam and John R. Fairbanks, Respondents, for an Order under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, against James Marshall, President, and Others, as and Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants
261 A.D. 1093·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Lindwood J. Putnam and John R. Fairbanks, Respondents, for an Order under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, against James Marshall, President, and Others, as and Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 976.] Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.