Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miller et al., Partners, et al. v. Walling, Administrator, 1944 — 321 U.S. 784 · caselaw · US
General
Miller et al., Partners, et al. v. Walling, Administrator
321 U.S. 784·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 670.
Miller et al., Partners, et al. v. Walling, Administrator.
March 13, 1944.
Messrs. George P. Lamb and Pierce Butler for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Douglas B. Maggs, Archibald Cox, and Joseph I. Nachman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.