Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benjamin C. Thornal, Respondent, v. William Pitt, Appellant, 1874 — 58 N.Y. 683 · caselaw · US
General
Benjamin C. Thornal, Respondent, v. William Pitt, Appellant
58 N.Y. 683·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benjamin C. Thornal, Respondent, v. William Pitt, Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1874;
decided November 10, 1874.)
This was an action by a real estate broker to recover commissions for alleged services in the sale of certain real estate of defendant. The court charged that plaintiff was employed by defendant, and as such negotiated the sale and earned his. commissions. Held, that the question whether plaintiff acted as the broker of defendant in negotiating the sale was, upon the evidence, a disputed question of fact, and should have-been submitted to the jury.
Wm. Henry Arnoux for the appellant.
Ph. Chase for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.