Torts · MBE-tested
Elizabeth Clark et al., Appellants, v. Jesse Durland, Respondent
187 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth Clark et al., Appellants, v. Jesse Durland, Respondent.
Clark v. Durland, 104 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Argued January 21, 1907;
decided February 19, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from trespassing -on a certain lake, the title to a portion of which was put in issue by the answer.
J. Newton Fiero, William Vanamee and F. H. Van Houten for appellants.
M. N. Kane and John J. Beattie for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Taking no part: Cullen, Ch. J., and Willard Bartlett, J.