IP
Frank H. BOGDA, Appellant, v. John B. OLSON, Appellee
2 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank H. BOGDA, Appellant, v. John B. OLSON, Appellee.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 13, 1924.
Decided January 5, 1925.)
No. 1681.
A. L. Morsell, of Milwaukee. Wis., for appellant.
L. O. Wheeler, of Milwaukee, Wis., and A. V. Cushman and J. J. Darby, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding involving an invention covering drinking fountains for stock. The opinion of the Examiner of Interferences contains a full and very careful discussion of every phase of the evidence. The Examiners in Chief likewise have thoroughly and satisfactorily considered this evidence; as has the Assistant Commissioner. We have examined the record, in the light of the briefs, oral arguments, and decisions of the Patent Office, and, being convinced of the correctness of the conclusion reached, and that further discussion is unnecessary, affirm the decision appealed from.