Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Colorado v. Knous, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado, 1955 — 348 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
Colorado v. Knous, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado
348 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 316,
Misc.
Colorado v. Knous, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court for the District of Colorado.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and Frank A. Wachob, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner.
Frank Delaney for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file and petition for writ of prohibition or writ of mandamus. A rule is ordered to issue, returnable Monday, February 7th, requiring the respondent to show cause why the petition for writ of prohibition or for a writ of mandamus should not be granted.