General
George Mengel, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blanche Mengel and Louis Eckhart, Sheriff
227 U.S. 675·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 178.
George Mengel, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blanche Mengel and Louis Eckhart, Sheriff.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.
Mr. Benjamin I. Salinger for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. I. S. Pepper for the defendants in error.-
January 27, 1913.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100-101; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102.)