Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LOS ANGELES HERALD-EXAMINER et al. v. KENNEDY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al., 1970 — 400 U.S. 3 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
LOS ANGELES HERALD-EXAMINER et al. v. KENNEDY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al.
400 U.S. 3·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions or this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LOS ANGELES HERALD-EXAMINER et al. v. KENNEDY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, et al.
No. 350.
Decided October 12, 1970
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The motion to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The orders of the Court of Appeals are vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with directions to dismiss the case as ■ moot. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpet Layers, 397 U. S. 655.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions or this petition.