General
Michael L. Woods et al., Respondents, v. Perez Dickinson, Appellant
149 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael L. Woods et al., Respondents, v. Perez Dickinson, Appellant.
Woods v. Dickinson, 78 Hun, 615, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 18, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Hamilton Odell for appellant.
Philip G. Bartlett and Simpson, Thacher & Barnum for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Babtlett, J., not voting.