Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Briggs et al. v. United States, 1954 — 348 U.S. 864 · caselaw · US
General
Briggs et al. v. United States
348 U.S. 864·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 306.
Briggs et al. v. United States.
W. P. Sandridge and Leon L. Rice, Jr. for Briggs, and Roy L. Deal for Clark, petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack, David L. Luce and Fred G. Folsom for the United States.