General
Eliza M. Sloane, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants
137 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza M. Sloane, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 6, 1893;
decided February 28, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 24,1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
• The following is the mem. handed down in this case : “ We think this judgment should be reversed on the principle of the opinions in Sutro et a. v. Manhattan Railway Company and Bookman v. Same, decided at this term, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.”
Arthur O. Townsend, for appellants.
Charles A. B. Pratt, Jr., for respondent.
Ante, page 592.
Ante, page 302.
[MAJORITY — Andrews, Ch. J.,]
Andrews, Ch. J.,
reads mem. for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.