Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHASE NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, as Successor, etc., Appellant, v. Fred R. SMITH, Superintendent of Banks, etc., et al., 1929 — 35 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
CHASE NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, as Successor, etc., Appellant, v. Fred R. SMITH, Superintendent of Banks, etc., et al.
35 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHASE NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, as Successor, etc., Appellant, v. Fred R. SMITH, Superintendent of Banks, etc., et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
August 19, 1929.
No. 8313.
Charles O. Bailey and John H. Voorhees, both of Sioux Palls, S. D., Prank M. Patterson, of New York City, and Theodore M. Bailey, of Sioux Palls, S. D., for appellant.
A. B. Fairbank, Rex M. Warren, P. G. Warren, and John S. Murphy, all of Sioux Palls, S. D., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of parties.