Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William M. Hoes, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 691 · caselaw · US
General
William M. Hoes, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent
153 N.Y. 691·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William M. Hoes, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent.
Hoes v. Hume, 5 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
(Argued June 24, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively May 12 and May 14, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
J. W BootJiby for appellant.
Robert M. Beyo for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.