Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Bailey v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.; Carden v. Brooks et al.; Hunter v. United States; Shapiro v. City of New York et al.; Graff Vending Co. et al. v. Hampton, dba Hampton Vending Supply; Goldstein, Receiver v. United States; Desmarais et al. v. Wachusett Regional School District et al.; Rose et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Stokes v. Bruce et al., 1973 — 414 U.S. 1087 · caselaw · US