Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Debtor, Shirley Venoya Remmert, Appellant, v. Delfin M. Venoya; et al., Appellees
311 F. App'x 28·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·2009
Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Debtor, Shirley Venoya Remmert, Appellant, v. Delfin M. Venoya; et al., Appellees.
No. 08-60040.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 2009.
Filed Jan. 28, 2009.
Shirley Venoya Remmert, Menlo Park, CA, pro se.
Delfín M. Venoya, Redwood City, CA, pro se.
State OF California Attorney General’s Office, Sacramento, CA, pro se.
Superior Court of San Mateo County, Redwood City, CA, pro se.
Portor Goltz, County Counsel, Redwood City, CA, pro se.
US Trustee’s Office, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
[MAJORITY]
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, this court hereby summarily affirms the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order denying appellant’s request for in-junctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.