General
Mittie L. WILLIAMSON v. STATE
32 Ala. App. 3224 So. 2d 769·Alabama Court of Appeals·1945·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
24 So.2d 769
Mittie L. WILLIAMSON v. STATE.
1 Div. 485.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
April 3, 1945.
Rehearing Granted Feb. 19, 1946.
D. R. Coley, Jr., of Mobile, Grover C. Powell, of Atlanta, Ga., Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Roy A. Swayze, of Arlington, Va., for appellant.
Wm. N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and John O. Plarris and W. W. Callahan, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.]
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
The points of decision involved upon this appeal are identical with those in the case of Marsh v. State, ante, p. 24, 21 So.2d 558, certiorari denied, 246 Ala. 539, 21 So.2d 564.
It therefore appears that it would serve no good purpose for this court to discuss these questions again.
Upon authority of the Marsh case, supra, the judgment’of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and rendered on authority of Grace Marsh v. State of Alabama, 66 S. Ct. 276.