Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max Baer et al., Appellants, v. The American CreditIndemnity Company of New York, Respondent, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 540 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Max Baer et al., Appellants, v. The American CreditIndemnity Company of New York, Respondent
191 N.Y. 540·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Baer et al., Appellants, v. The American Credit-Indemnity Company of New York, Respondent.
Baer v‘. American Credit-Indemnity Go., 114 App. Div. 233, affirmed.
(Argued February 27, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 15, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover on an indemnity bond purporting to insure plaintiffs from loss through insolvency of debtors.
Charles Goldzier and Louis J. Vorhaus for appellants.
William N. Cohen and Messmore Kendall for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch.-J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.