General
Frank P. HAMMOND v. CITY OF CLEVELAND et al.
61 F.2d 1029·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank P. HAMMOND v. CITY OF CLEVELAND et al.
No. 6063.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 10, 1932.
Geo. D. Hile and Edw. Blythin, both of Cleveland, Ohio, and Edw. M. Ballard, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
W. George Kerr and Henry S. Braiuard, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed because question involved is moot.