General
NEWBERG v. HENSON
12 Cal. 280·Supreme Court of California·1859·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEWBERG v. HENSON.
Where there is no properly authorized statement on appeal; Held, That the special verdict of the jury is conclusive of the facts found.
Appeal from the Eleventh District, County of Placer.
Smith Hardy for Appellant.
Hale, Hillyer Myers for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — Terry, C. J.,]
Terry, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
There is in this case no properly authorized statement on appeal. The special verdict of the jury is therefore conclusive as to the facts, and entirely sustains the judgment of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.