Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick Treacy, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Ellis et al., Defendants. Raphael J. Moses, Appellant; Charles E. Schaffner, et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Patrick Treacy, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Ellis et al., Defendants. Raphael J. Moses, Appellant; Charles E. Schaffner, et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick Treacy, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Ellis et al., Defendants. Raphael J. Moses, Appellant; Charles E. Schaffner, et al., Respondents.
Treaoy v. Ellis, 45 App. Div. 492, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 26, 1900;
decided March 6, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart-merit, entered December 13, 1899, affirming an order granting the application of the respondents herein for the distribution of • certain funds in the hands of the chamberlain of the city of New York, and denying the application of appellant to set aside the transfer to respondent Schaffner by the receiver of the Grand Central Bank, and to distribute said fund to the stockholders of said bank.
The motion was made on the grounds that the appeal cannot be taken as .of right to the Court of Appeals, the order appealed from not being one finally determining an action or special proceeding, nor one granting a new trial on exceptions, nór has the Appellate Division allowed said appeal nor' certified that questions of law have arisen which should be reviewed by this court.
William J. Leitch for motion.
Henry B. Heylman opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.