General
In the Matter of the Application of L. Walter Stephens and Maude Marie Stephens, Respondents, to Compel Maurice B. Gladstone, Appellant, Attorney, to Account and Pay over Monies Collected by Him as Attorney at Law, and for Other Relief as Contained Hereinbelow. Maude Marie Stephens, Plaintiff, v. L. Walter Stephens, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Maude Marie Stephens, Plaintiff, v. L. Walter Stephens, Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank and Central Savings Bank, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
258 A.D. 780·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of L. Walter Stephens and Maude Marie Stephens, Respondents, to Compel Maurice B. Gladstone, Appellant, Attorney, to Account and Pay over Monies Collected by Him as Attorney at Law, and for Other Relief as Contained Hereinbelow. Maude Marie Stephens, Plaintiff, v. L. Walter Stephens, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Maude Marie Stephens, Plaintiff, v. L. Walter Stephens, Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank and Central Savings Bank, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present —• Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.