Corporations
Harry Meyerson, as a Stockholder of Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., Suing in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., et al., Appellants
20 A.D.2d 878·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1964·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry Meyerson, as a Stockholder of Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., Suing in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order, entered on February 18, 1964, denying motions by the several defendants to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. (See Nomako v. Ashton, 20 A D 2d 331.) Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.