General
W. E. Stewart v. E. G. McAllister et al.
255 U.S. 559·Supreme Court of the United States·1921
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 174.
W. E. Stewart v. E. G. McAllister et al.
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District, of the State of Texas.
Argued January 24, 1921.
Decided January 31, 1921.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction: (1) Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193.
Mr. Don A. Bliss, with whom Mr. T. T. Vanderhoeven and Mr. Benjamin A. Greathouse were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. G. George, for defendants in error, submitted.