Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Warren H. PILLSBURY, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees' Compensation Commission for the 13th Compensation District, Appellant, v. The CHARLES NELSON COMPANY, a Corporation, and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation, Appellees (two cases), 1932 — 56 F.2d 80 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Warren H. PILLSBURY, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees' Compensation Commission for the 13th Compensation District, Appellant, v. The CHARLES NELSON COMPANY, a Corporation, and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation, Appellees (two cases)
56 F.2d 80·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Warren H. PILLSBURY, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission for the 13th Compensation District, Appellant, v. The CHARLES NELSON COMPANY, a Corporation, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation, Appellees (two cases).
Nos. 6543, 6544.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 8, 1932.
George J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and Leo C. Dunnell, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
John H. Black and James M. Wallace, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — WILBUR, Circuit Judge.]
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
On authority of Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Company (C. C. A.) 56 F.(2d) 74, and Pillsbury v. Pacific Steamship Company (C. C. A.) 56 F.(2d) 79, both filed February 1, 1932, the judgments, 48 F.(2d) 883, are affirmed.